作者简介 乔•哈利戴（Jon Halliday），1939年6月生于都柏林，1961年毕业于牛津大学人文科学专业（主修古希腊、拉丁文、古代史与哲学）。他撰写、编辑了九部书，其中包括与劳拉•穆尔维于1972年合著的《道格拉斯•瑟克》。他于1970年至1976年担任《银幕》杂志编委会委员。此外，他还曾在意大利与墨西哥的大学任教。 译者简介 张明，金融从业人士，美国文学与好莱坞电影爱好者。2007年美国留学期间认识瑟克电影，2009年9月借得洛杉矶市立图书馆所藏1971年版的《瑟克论瑟克》，开始翻译此书的历程，后据新版多次修订，始告完成。

This volume features a complete set of problems, hints, and solutions based on Stanford University's well-known competitive examination in mathematics. It offers students at both high school and college levels an excellent mathematics workbook. Filled with rigorous problems, it assists students in developing and cultivating their logic and probability skills. 1974 edition.

This volume features a complete set of problems, hints, and solutions based on Stanford University's well-known competitive examination in mathematics. It offers students at both high school and college levels an excellent mathematics workbook. Filled with rigorous problems, it assists students in developing and cultivating their logic and probability skills. 1974 edition.

This widely anticipated volume offers a systematic introduction to and striking analysis of the central issues animating current debate in moral philosophy.

This widely anticipated volume offers a systematic introduction to and striking analysis of the central issues animating current debate in moral philosophy.

An industry insider explains why there is so much bad software—and why academia doesn't teach programmers what industry wants them to know.

Can consciousness be fitted into a naturalistic worldview or is it inherently mysterious? In virtue of what does a physical organism come to have an inner conscious life? This book argues that we are not equipped to understand the workings of conciousness, despite its objective naturalness. Introspection does not reveal the hiddent structure of consciousness and it is this th...(展开全部)

This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as...(展开全部)